THE CONDO BOOK PROJECT

Concorde Condominium offering plan

220 East 65th Street · Manhattan, New York 10021

AG plan ID CD890467 · Accepted Sep 26, 1990

Overview

The Attorney General's record lists Concorde Condominium at 220 East 65th Street as a conversion construction condominium with 0 residential units. The sponsor is 225 East 64th Street, LLC. The plan was accepted for filing in September 1990 and has 37 amendments listed.

Residential units
0
Parking units
0
Storage units
0
Commercial units
0
Accepted
Sep 26, 1990
Latest amendment
No. 37, submitted Jul 15, 2014

Coverage. Offering Plan is searchable here. 18 posted documents not searched yet. Some listed amendments are not searched.

3D massing drawing of Concorde Condominium and neighboring buildings
3D massing from NYC Building Footprints, not a photograph. The plan's building is in green.

Compare nearby condo plans

Pricing & units

Residential
0
Commercial
0
Parking
0
Storage
0
Other
0
Total units
0
Total offering price, initial
$133.9 million

Unit counts and total offering price as recorded by the Attorney General. The total offering price is the sum of all units at the plan's prices, not a sale price.

Not yet extracted. Unit-by-unit prices, unit sizes and $/sf. These are in Schedule A of the plan and its amendments.

Budget & charges

Not yet extracted. Projected first-year budget, common charges by unit and real estate tax estimates. These are in Schedule B, and later amendments may revise them.

Team

Sponsor
225 East 64th Street, LLC
Sponsor's counsel
Charles W. Weiss, Esq.

As recorded by the Attorney General.

Not yet extracted. Architect, managing agent, selling agent and other named professionals. They are named in the plan, and an amendment can replace them.

Floor plans

No pages headed “Floor plans” were found in the searched documents.

Floor plans are drawings inside the plan PDF. Open the plan from the Attorney General's site and go to the pages listed.

Documents

Amendments

The original plan may have changed. These are the amendments listed for this filing.

No.SubmittedStatusSearchable here
37Jul 15, 2014AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
36Jun 13, 2013AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
35Apr 26, 2012AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
34Jun 9, 2011AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
33Dec 4, 2009AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
32Aug 27, 2004AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
31Jul 19, 2004AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
30May 28, 2004AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
29May 28, 2004AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
28Apr 19, 2004AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
27Mar 19, 2004AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
26Mar 4, 2004AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
25Jan 23, 2004AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
24Aug 14, 2002AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
23Jul 25, 2002AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
22May 23, 2001AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
21Aug 28, 2000AcceptedPosted, not searched yet
20May 21, 1999AcceptedNot posted
19May 12, 1998AcceptedNot posted
18May 8, 1998AcceptedNot posted
17Feb 3, 1997AcceptedNot posted
16Sep 4, 1996AcceptedNot posted
15Feb 28, 1996AcceptedNot posted
14Jul 28, 1995AcceptedNot posted
13Jul 21, 1994AcceptedNot posted
12May 26, 1994AcceptedNot posted
11Feb 9, 1994AcceptedNot posted
10Jan 7, 1994AcceptedNot posted
9Nov 4, 1993AcceptedNot posted
8Jun 3, 1993AcceptedNot posted
7Nov 20, 1992AcceptedNot posted
6Jun 9, 1992AcceptedNot posted
5Dec 27, 1991AcceptedNot posted
4Dec 13, 1991AcceptedNot posted
3Sep 26, 1991AcceptedNot posted
2Mar 19, 1991AcceptedNot posted
1Feb 20, 1991—Not posted

About this record

Source: New York State Attorney General, Real Estate Finance Bureau. The Condo Book Project is an independent research tool and is not affiliated with the Attorney General's office. Plan record last checked Sep 24, 2026; plan effective Oct 29, 1992. Offering Plan is searchable here. 18 posted documents not searched yet. Some listed amendments are not searched.

Offering plans describe what was offered when filed. They do not confirm current availability, pricing, or the building's present condition. Review the source documents and later amendments before relying on anything here.

Found an error? Report it →